Thursday, October 25, 2007

A Learning Contract Between Parent and Child

Cooperative Learning between Parent and Child and Educational Contract

In Buddhism there are 4 primary relationships or more aptly responsibilities that people should follow. One of these is Parent Child. The Child must be willing to learn and the parent willing to teach. These are responsibilities we as a society should treat them this way. I do not mean this next statement to offend anyone or present a stereotypical reference, but who are consistently some of the best students Asian Americans. I firmly believe it is cultural the premise of being well educated is firmly established in the family structure. If we as a society can develop a mindset that education is a key to improving our country as a whole, and not just for those who can afford it, would we not all benefit?

The premise I believe is to set parameters and expectations for BOTH students and parents. We can set examples for the parents by providing an innovative and engaging teaching environment that establishes the parents as true partners. My youngest son has brought home reading homework that I must read with him and discuss. As a parent I look at this as quality time spent with my child, not more work. I then sign off that we have done it together. I understand the implications of the exercise (homework for parents), but I am firm believer that if creative tools are developed to have the parents actively participate in their Childs education many will make the effort.
This is not to say making it compulsory (or maybe it should be), but a parent is charged by society to be responsible for their Childs well being ....does that not include getting a good education? Maybe the answer here is a change in our society at large? The pursuit of wealth and success is often more important than being an active participant in a Childs life. What could be more rewarding than having a positive effect on your Childs life? The amount of input to a Childs education from an individual parent should have obvious parameters. This is where a standardized program (minimum requirements possibly) must be set by ONE body (Federal Government?). If a school district wants to complement the program with curriculum above and beyond the minimums, sure but still provide the basic minimum to all. I hope to discuss further this thought in the Future.

No comments: